STScI

Advanced Camera for Surveys Instrument Handbook for Cycle 14

TOC PREV NEXT INDEX PDF

Chapter 9:
Overheads and Orbit-Time Determination


9.1 Overview
9.2 ACS Exposure Overheads
    9.2.1 Subarrays
9.3 Orbit Use Determination Examples
    9.3.1 Sample Orbit Calculation 1:
    9.3.2 Sample Orbit Calculation 2
    9.3.3 Sample Orbit Calculation 3:
    9.3.4 Sample Orbit Calculation 4:
    9.3.5 Sample Orbit Calculation 5:

This Chapter describes the overheads associated with ACS observations and gives examples showing how to determine the number of orbits your program will require.

9.1 Overview


After you establish the set of scientific exposures and any additional target-acquisition or calibration exposures that you require for your program, you are ready to determine the total number of orbits to request. Generally, this is a straightforward exercise involving compilation of the overheads on the individual exposures, packing the exposure plus overhead time into individual orbits, and tallying up the results to determine your total orbit request. In some cases, it may be an iterative process as you refine your exposure requests to more fully exploit the orbits.

The Phase I Call for Proposals includes proposal instructions that provide information on the Observatory policies and practices with respect to orbit-time requests. The HST Primer provides specific advice on orbit determination. Below, we provide a summary of the ACS specific overheads and give several examples that illustrate how to calculate your orbit requirements for Phase I Proposals.

9.2 ACS Exposure Overheads


The overheads on exposures are summarized in Table 9.1 and Table 9.2. All numbers given are approximate; they do not differentiate in detail the overheads for different ACS modes and configurations. These overhead times are to be used (in conjunction with the actual exposure times and the instructions in the HST Primer) to estimate the total number of orbits for your proposal. After your HST proposal is accepted, you will be asked to submit a Phase II proposal to support scheduling of your approved observations. At that time you will be presented with actual, up-to-date overheads by the APT scheduling software. Allowing sufficient time for overhead in your Phase I proposal is important; additional time to cover unplanned overhead will not be granted later.

The following list presents important points for each type of overhead:

Note that identical exposures are generated automatically if the observer specifies the proposal optional parameters CR-SPLIT (for n>1) or PATTERN or if Number_of_Iterations > 1. If it is not specified, CR-SPLIT defaults to n=2. In general, identical exposures are defined here as exposures at the same target and with the same detector and the same filter(s). PATTERNS also involve slews and therefore slew overheads.

For ACQ mode, the overhead includes double the specified exposure time. The reason is that it is necessary to have two acquisition images, hence two exposures, in order to eliminate possible image defects which can interfere with target acquisition. The flight software ensures that two images are taken, the user does not need to specify them in the proposal.

The overhead time for serial buffer dumps arises in certain cases from the overheads associated with the on-board data management and switching over the cameras. The on-board buffer memory can hold no more than one WFC image. The next WFC image can be placed into the buffer only after the buffer dumps the previous image, which takes 349 sec. If the next exposure time is longer than 339 sec (for WFC) or 346 (for HRC; 16 HRC images may be taken before a buffer dump is triggered), the buffer dump will occur during that exposure, and no overhead is imposed. However, if the next exposure time is shorter than 339 sec (WFC) or 346 sec (HRC), then the dump must occur between the two exposures. Sequences of many short HRC or SBC exposures can also lead to serial dumps when the buffer becomes full. In this case the buffer dump time becomes an overhead to be included into the orbit time budget. This overhead can severely constrain the number of short exposures one can squeeze into an orbit. Subarrays can be used to lower the data volume for some applications.

A serious penalty is imposed for toggling between SBC and HRC within an orbit. The time to switch over from SBC to HRC is 480 sec. The opposite switch takes 650 sec, and in both cases there is an additional overhead of 6 min. associated with buffer dump. This consumes a significant portion of the available orbital time. Thus, whenever possible, one should plan to use HRC and SBC in different orbits.

9.2.1 Subarrays

At the end of each exposure, data are read out into ACS's internal buffer memory where they are stored until they are dumped into HST's solid state data recorder. The ACS internal buffer memory holds 34 Mbyte or the equivalent of 1 full WFC frame or 16 HRC or SBC frames. Thus, after observing a full WFC frame, the internal buffer memory must be dumped before the next exposure can be taken. The buffer dump takes 349 sec and may not occur while ACS is being actively commanded. Of this time, 339 sec (for one WFC image) or 346 sec (for 16 HRC images) is spent dumping the image. The buffer dump cannot be done during the next exposure if the latter is shorter than 339 sec. If, however, the next exposure is less than 339 seconds the buffer dump will create an extra 5.8 minutes of overhead.

If your science program is such that a smaller FOV can be used, then one way of possibly reducing the frequency and hence overheads associated with buffer dumps is to use WFC subarrays. With subarrays, only a fraction of the detector is read out, a smaller volume of data per frame is stored in the buffer, and a larger number of frames can be stored before requiring a dump. Using subarrays not only reduces the amount of time spent dumping the buffer but in some cases may reduce the readout time, since only a portion of the detector is readout. We refer the user to Chapter 8 for a discussion of some of the limitations of subarrays. If the user elects to define a subarray of arbitrary size and location, allowed on an available-but-unsupported basis, then matching bias frames will not be automatically provided by STScI. Any bias frames specified by the user will typically be scheduled during the following occultation (i.e., they do not add to the overheads during visibility time). Dark frames and flat fields will be extracted from full frame images. In some special cases where a general subarray is cleverly defined so as to include a physical overscan region, no separate bias frames are needed.

9.3 Orbit Use Determination Examples


The easiest way to learn to compute total orbit time requests is to work through a few examples. Below we provide five different examples:

These examples represent fairly typical uses of ACS.

9.3.1 Sample Orbit Calculation 1:

Consider a target to be imaged with WFC in a given filter in one orbit. Using the Exposure Time Calculator (ETC), we find that we need 2400 sec of exposure time to reach the desired level of signal-to-noise ratio. Given that the observation must be split into a series of two exposures by CR-SPLIT (CR-SPLIT=2), we map the overheads and the science exposure times onto the orbit as follows:


Table 9.3: Orbit Calculation for Example
Action Time (min.) Explanation
Orbit 1
Initial guide-star acquisition
6.1
Needed at start of observation of a new target
WFC overhead for the first exposure
4.0
Includes filter change, camera set-up, and readout
First science exposure
20.0

WFC overhead for the subsequent science exposure in the series
2.5
Includes readout
The next science exposure in the series
20.0

Total time for science exposures
40.0

Total used time in the orbit
52.6


Thus, the two WFC exposures totaling 2400 sec make full use of the typically available time in one orbit. The exposure times can be adjusted if the actual target visibility time differs from the derived total used time.

9.3.2 Sample Orbit Calculation 2

This example illustrates the impact of short WFC exposures on the useful time in the orbit. We have one orbit to observe a target with WFC in two filters, so the observation consists of two series, each with two identical CR-SPLIT exposures. The ETC has shown that at the minimally accepted signal-to-noise ratio the exposure time must be 540 sec for each of the filters, so each of the CR-SPLITs must be at least 270 sec long. For the target declination, we find that the visibility time is 55 min. The time budget for the orbit is then as follows:


Table 9.4: Orbit Calculation for Example 2
Action Time (min.) Explanation
Orbit 1
Initial guide-star acquisition 6.1 Needed at start of observation of a new target
WFC overhead for the first exposures in two series 2×4=8 Includes filter change, camera set-up, and readout
WFC overhead for subsequent exposures in each of the two series 2×2.5=5 Includes readout
Additional overhead for all but the last exposures in the orbit 5.8×3=~17 Needed to dump the buffer because the next exposure is too short (shorter than 339 sec) to accommodate the dump time.
Science exposures 4×4.5=18
Total time for science exposures 18
Total used time in the orbit 54

Comparing with the previous example, we see that although with the adopted minimum exposure times we can squeeze the observation into one orbit, the efficiency of the orbit use is very low because of the large overheads associated with buffer dumps. However, if we increase each of the four exposure times so that they are larger than 339 sec, we avoid these additional overheads. This would free ~17 min. of the orbit time for science, which allows us to almost double the science exposure time (35 min. instead of 18 min.) and thus significantly improve signal-to-noise.

Similarly, a subarray can be used to readout only a fraction of the detector, allowing more frames to be stored in the buffer before requiring a dump. In this example, using four WFC1-1K subarrays for 4 short (t<339s) exposures would save 176s in readout time and 1047s in dump time. This frees up ~20 minutes of orbit time to be used for science.

9.3.3 Sample Orbit Calculation 3:

This example demonstrates the orbit calculation for a coronagraphic observation. We want to obtain coronagraphic images of a star in two filters, F250W and F606W. The ETC has shown that the exposure times adequate for our scientific goals are 5 min. in F606W and 30 min. in F250W. From the orbit visibility table (see the HST Primer) we find that at the target declination of 15 degrees the target visibility time is 52 min. With CR-SPLIT=2, we thus have to accommodate in that period 35 min. of four science exposures grouped in two series. The orbit calculation goes like this:


Table 9.5: Orbit Calculation for Example 3
Action Time (min.) Explanation
Orbit 1
Initial guide-star acquisition
6.1
Needed at start of observation of a new target
Target acquisition
3.5+(2×0.1)=3.7
Point-source acquisition on target
HRC overhead for the first exposures in the series
2×2.5=5
Includes filter change, camera set-up, and readout
HRC overhead for the subsequent exposures in the series
2×1=2
Includes readout
Science exposures in F606W
2×2.5=5

Science exposures in F250W
2×15=30

Total time for science exposures
35

Total used time in the orbit
~51.8


The derived total used time in the orbit shows that our target can indeed be imaged in the selected filters in one orbit. Since there remains 3 min. of unused time, we can adjust our exposure times to make full use of the available time.

9.3.4 Sample Orbit Calculation 4:

This example illustrates the orbit calculation for a WFC observation with the ACS box pattern, which implements imaging at four offset pointings. The goal of the observation is to obtain a dithered image of a field in such a way that would allow us to bridge the 50-pixel interchip gap between the WFC CCDs in the combined image. Given the WFC plate scale of 0.05 arcsec/pix, this requires that the offsets in the dithering pattern are larger than 2.5 arcsec. Each offset will then take 0.5 min. to move the spacecraft from one pointing in the pattern to another. We have determined that the exposure time necessary to reach the desired signal-to-noise ratio is 80 min. The visibility time at our target declination is 58 min. In this observation we do not want to rely on cosmic ray removal provided by the dithering data reduction package, and set CR-SPLIT=2 to be able to remove cosmic rays from the four individual images separately. As a result, the orbit calculation will involve a series of 8 exposures (two exposures at each of the four pointings in the dithering pattern) split across two orbits:


Table 9.6: Orbit Calculation for Example 4
Action Time (min.) Explanation
Orbit 1
Initial guide-star acquisition
6.1
Needed at start of observation of a new target
WFC overhead for the first exposures in the series
4
Includes filter change, camera set-up, and readout
WFC overhead for the subsequent 3 exposures in the series
3×2.5=7.5
Includes readout
Spacecraft slew
0.5
To offset from the first to the second pointing
Four science exposures
4×10=40
Exposures at the first two pointings in the dither pattern
Total time for science exposures
40

Total used time in the orbit
58.1

Orbit 2
Guide-star re-acquisition
5.7
Needed at start of a new orbit to observe the same target
WFC overhead for the remaining exposures in the series
4×2.5=10
Includes readout
Spacecraft slews
2×0.5=1
To offset to the third and fourth pointings
Four science exposures
4×10=40
Exposures at the second two pointings in the dither pattern
Total time for science exposures
40

Total used time in the orbit
56.7


The total used time in the first orbit comes out a little bit larger than the visibility time. However, given the conservative nature of the adopted overhead times as well as a bit of flexibility in the adopted signal-to-noise ratio, the difference is not significant. It is to be remembered that the purpose of the above exercises is to estimate how many orbits to request for our science program rather than to exactly design the observation.

9.3.5 Sample Orbit Calculation 5:

This example illustrates the orbit calculation for a simple 30 min. WFC grism spectroscopic observation broken down by CR-SPLIT=2 into a series of two exposures.


Table 9.7: Orbit Calculation for Example 5
Action Time (min.) Explanation
Orbit 1
Initial guide-star acquisition
6.1
Needed at start of observation of a new target
Predefined imaging exposure for grism spectroscopy
7
Needed to co-locate the targets and their spectra in the FOV
WFC overhead for the first science exposure in the series
4.0
Includes filter change, camera set-up, and readout
WFC overhead for the subsequent science exposure in the series
2.5
Includes readout
Two science exposures
2×15.0=30

Total science exposure time
30.0

Total used time in the orbit
49.6


Unlike similar imaging exposures, here we have to take into account an additional imaging exposure before the sequence of spectroscopic exposures, which takes 10 min. off the available orbit time.


TOC PREV NEXT INDEX PDF
Space Telescope Science Institute
http://www.stsci.edu
Voice: (410) 338-1082
help@stsci.edu