Both WFPC2 and STIS are capable of imaging over the same wavelength ranges between ~1150Å and ~11000Å. At much longer wavelengths NICMOS must be used.
Advantages of each instrument may be summarized as follows.
In general, WFPC2 has a much greater selection of filters and wider field-of-view than STIS, but STIS has greater detective efficiency in the UV and for its long-pass and unfiltered modes. Table 1.4 compares the detective efficiency for WFPC2 and STIS filters with similar bandpasses. For UV imaging STIS is greatly superior due to higher throughput and insensitivity to filter red-leak; only if some detail of a WFPC2 filter bandpass were needed, would it be a viable choice.
For both [OII] 3727Å and [OIII] 5007Å imaging STIS has much higher QE and is preferred, unless the larger WFPC2 field-of-view is an important factor. The WFPC2 [OIII] filter is wider than its STIS counter-part, which may also be useful for redshifted lines. For broad-band imaging the unfiltered and 5500Å long-pass modes of STIS again have higher efficiency than WFPC2, though with reduced field-of-view.
Instrument |
Filter |
Mean Wavelength (Å) |
Peak QE2 |
|
---|---|---|---|---|
WFPC2 |
F122M |
1420 |
100 |
0.11% |
STIS |
F25LYA |
1216 |
85 |
0.32% |
WFPC2 |
F160BW |
1492 |
500 |
0.07% |
STIS |
25MAMA (FUV) |
1370 |
320 |
4.5% |
WFPC2 |
F255W |
2586 |
393 |
0.5% |
STIS |
25MAMA (NUV) |
2220 |
1200 |
3.1% |
WFPC2 |
F375N |
3738 |
42 |
0.9% |
STIS |
F28X50OII |
3740 |
80 |
3.7% |
WFPC2 |
F502N |
5013 |
37 |
5.8% |
STIS |
F28X50OIII |
5007 |
5 |
11% |
WFPC2 |
F606W |
5935 |
2200 |
14% |
STIS |
F28X50LP |
~73003 |
2720 |
12% |
STIS |
50CCD |
~5800 |
4410 |
15% |
1Note that definition of FWHM is different from "effective width" elsewhere herein. 2Includes instrument and OTA. 35500Å long pass filter. |
Space Telescope Science Institute http://www.stsci.edu Voice: (410) 338-1082 help@stsci.edu |