Space Telescope Science Institute   1.2 Which Instrument to Use: WFPC2, ACS, NICMOS, or STIS?  1.2.2 Comparison of WFPC2 and NICMOS

1.2.1 Comparison of WFPC2 and ACS


Advantages of each instrument may be summarized as follows.

WFPC2 advantages are:

ACS advantages are:

For projects using optical broad band filters, ACS is better suited due to its wider field of view, better sampling of the PSF, and higher throughput.

For projects using UV and narrow band filters the choice may depend on source size. For relatively compact objects, ACS is better due to the better PSF sampling and higher throughput and solar blind performance. For larger objects, e.g., the large planets Jupiter and Saturn, and diffuse galactic nebula such as the Orion and Eagle Nebulae, the larger field of view of WFPC2 makes it competitive.

Table 1.2: Comparison of WFPC2 and ACS Filters.
WFPC2
ACS
ACS / WFPC2
Wide-Field
Imaging Effic'y1
Filter
FOV
(arcsec)2
Approx Peak
Effic'y3
Filter
Camera
FOV
(arcsec)4
Approx Peak
Effic'y 3
Broad Band





F160W
90" x 90"
0.07%
F150LP
SBC
31" x 35"
3%
5.74
F170W
134" x 134"
0.17%
F165LP
SBC
31" x 35"
0.9%
0.32
F185W
134" x 134"
0.19%
-
-
-
-
-
F218W
134" x 134"
0.28%
F220W
HRC
26" x 29"
5%
0.75
F255W
134" x 134"
0.45%
F250W
HRC
26" x 29"
6.1%
0.56
F300W
134" x 134"
1.9%
-
-
-
-
-
F336W
134" x 134"
3.5%
F330W
HRC
26" x 29"
10.5%
0.13
F380W
134" x 134"
3.7%
-
-
-
-
-
F439W
134" x 134"
3.9%
F435W
WFC HRC
202" x 202"
26" x 29"
33%
22%
19.2
0.24
F450W
134" x 134"
8.5%
F475W
WFC HRC
202" x 202"
26" x 29"
36%
24%
9.62
0.12
F555W
134" x 134"
11%
F555W
WFC HRC
202" x 202"
26" x 29"
37%
23%
7.64
0.09
F569W
134" x 134"
11%
-
-
-
-
-
F606W
134" x 134"
14%
F606W
WFC HRC
202" x 202"
26" x 29"
44%
27%
7.14
0.08
F622W
134" x 134"
14%
F625W
WFC HRC
202" x 202"
26" x 29"
43%
26%
6.98
0.08
F675W
134" x 134"
14%
-
-
-
-
-
F702W
134" x 134"
14%
-
-
-
-
-
F785LP
134" x 134"
5%
-
-
-
-
-
F791W
134" x 134"
9%
F775W
WFC HRC
202" x 202"
26" x 29"
42%
22%
10.6
0.10
F814W
134" x 134"
10%
F814W
WFC HRC
202" x 202"
26" x 29"
42%
22%
9.54
0.09
F850LP
134" x 134"
3.9%
F850LP
WFC HRC
202" x 202"
26" x 29"
25%
13%
14.6
0.14
Medium Band





F122M
134" x 134"
0.11%
F122M
SBC
31" x 35"
0.9%
0.49
F410M
134" x 134"
4%
-
-
-
-
-
F467M
134" x 134"
5.5%
B. Ramp
(FR459M)
WFC
HRC
65" x 100"
26" x 29"
29%

0.44

F547M
134" x 134"
11%
F550M
WFC HRC
202" x 202"
26" x 29"
40%
25%
8.26
0.10
F1042M
134" x 134"
0.5%
B. Ramp
(FR914M)
WFC
HRC
65" x 100"
26" x 29"
4%

1.0

Narrow Band





F343N
134" x 134"
0.39%
F344N
HRC
26" x 29"
10%
1.08
F375N
134" x 134"
0.9%
OII Ramp
(FR388N)
WFC HRC
65" x 100"
26" x 29"
4%

0.22

FQUVN
3767Å
60" x 60"
1.3%
OII Ramp
(FR388N)
WFC HRC
65" x 100"
26" x 29"
6%

1.2

FQUVN
3831Å
67" x 67"
1.5%
OII Ramp
(FR388N)
WFC HRC
65" x 100"
26" x 29"
8%

1.0

FQUVN
3915Å
67" x 67"
1.9%
OII Ramp
(FR388N)
WFC HRC
65" x 100"
26" x 29"
10%

0.9

FQUVN
3993Å
67" x 67"
2.3%
OII Ramp
(FR388N)
WFC HRC
65" x 100"
26" x 29"
10%

0.8

F390N
134" x 134"
1.9%
OII Ramp
(FR388N)
WFC HRC
65" x 100"
26" x 29"
10%

0.23

F437N
134" x 134"
3%
OII Ramp
(FR423N)
WFC
45" x 85"
10%
0.16
F469N
134" x 134"
3.7%
OII Ramp
(FR462N)
WFC
60" x 85"
13%
0.17
F487N
134" x 134"
4.8%
OIII Ramp
(FR505N)
WFC HRC
65" x 100"
26" x 29"
18%

0.20

F502N
134" x 134"
5.8%
F502N
WFC HRC
202" x 202"
26" x 29"
28%
19%
11.0
0.14
FQCH4
5435Å
30" x 30"
9.5%
OIII Ramp
(FR551N)
WFC
45" x 85"
28%
2.7
F588N
134" x 134"
13%
OIII Ramp
(FR551N)
WFC
45" x 85"
34%
0.12
FQCH4
6199Å
30" x 30"
12%
OIII Ramp
(FR601N)
WFC
60" x 85"
29%
2.3
F631N
134" x 134"
13%
OIII Ramp
(FR601N)
WFC
60" x 85"
31%
0.11
F656N
134" x 134"
11%
H Ramp
(FR656N)
WFC HRC
65" x 100"
26" x 29"




F658N
134" x 134"
11%
F658N
WFC HRC
202" x 202"
26" x 29"
44%
26%
9.09
0.10
F673N
134" x 134"
12%
H Ramp
(FR656N)
WFC HRC
65" x 100"
26" x 29"
28%

0.11

FQCH4
7278Å
30" x 30"
10%
H Ramp
(FR716N)
WFC
45" x 85"
31%
3
FQCH4
8930Å
30" x 30"
2.9%
F892N
WFC
HRC
202" x 202"
26" x 29"

12%

3.47
F953N
134" x 134"
2.2%
IR Ramp
(FR931N)
WFC
60" x 85"
12%
0.31
1Relative efficiency for ACS vs. WFPC2 for wide-field imaging. Defined as [(ACS FOV area)x(ACS efficiency)] / [(WFPC2 FOV area) x (WFPC2 efficiency)]. For WFPC2 we have reduced FOV for the missing "L" shaped region around PC1.
2The full WFPC2 FOV is a 150" x 150" L-shaped region, with area equivalent to a 134" x 134" square, which we use for comparisons to ACS.
3Efficiency near filter pivot wavelength; includes HST+instrument+filters.
4For ACS the full WFC FOV is 202"x202", the full HRC FOV is 26"x29", and the full SBC FOV is 31" x 35". When using the narrow band ramp filters the larger WFC FOV gets reduced, depending on the FOV location. There are three possible locations: inner region (45"x85"), middle region (65"x100"), and outer region (60"x85").


 1.2 Which Instrument to Use: WFPC2, ACS, NICMOS, or STIS?  1.2.2 Comparison of WFPC2 and NICMOS
Space Telescope Science Institute
http://www.stsci.edu
Voice: (410) 338-1082
help@stsci.edu