The MAMA Detectors

MAMA Properties

There are two MAMA detectors: the STIS/FUV-MAMA provides coverage from 1150 to 1700 Å and the STIS/NUV-MAMA provides coverage from 1650 to 3100 Å (with lower response to below 1200 Å). The STIS MAMA detectors are photon-counting devices which process events serially. They can be used to take data in either an accumulate (ACCUM) mode in which a time-integrated image is produced, or in a time series (TIME-TAG) mode in which the detector location and time of arrival of each photon are recorded as an event stream (see "MAMA ACCUM Mode" on page 216 and "MAMA TIME-TAG Mode" on page 219, respectively). The primary benefits afforded by the STIS MAMAs, in comparison with previous HST UV spectroscopic detectors such as those of the GHRS and FOS, are high spatial resolution, two-dimensional imaging over a relatively large field of view, and low background for point sources. The MAMA detector was developed by J. Timothy and R. Bybee for X-ray and UV imaging applications. The properties of the STIS MAMA detectors are summarized in Table 7.7.

Table 7.7: STIS MAMA Detector Performance Characteristics

Characteristic	FUV-MAMA Performance	NUV-MAMA Performance
Photocathode	CsI	Cs2Te
Wavelength range	1150-1700 Å	1600-3100 Å
Pixel format	1024 x 1024	1024 x 1024
Pixel size	25 x 25 µm	25 x 25 µm
Image mode pixel plate scale	0.0245 x 0.0247 arcseconds (clear) 0.0246 x 0.0247 arcseconds (filtered)	0.0245 x 0.0248 arcseconds
Field of view	25.1 x 25.3 arcseconds	25.1 x 25.4 arcseconds
Quantum efficiency	25% @ 1216 Å	10% @ 2537 Å
Dark count	5 x 10-6 to 1 x 10-5 counts sec-1 pix-1	8 x 10-4 to 1.7 x 10-3 counts sec-1 pix-1
Global count-rate linearity limit1	285,000 counts sec-1	285,000 counts sec-1
Local count-rate linearity limit 1	~220 counts sec-1 pix-1	~340 counts sec-1 pix-1

1 Rate at which counting shows 10% deviation from linearity. These count rates are well above the bright-object screening limits.

Figure 7.9 and Figure 7.10 illustrate the design of the FUV- and NUV-MAMA, respectively. A photocathode material is deposited on the front surface. The FUV-MAMA has an opaque CsI photocathode deposited directly on the face of the curved microchannel plate (MCP); the NUV-MAMA has a semi-transparent Cs₂Te photocathode deposited on the back side of the detector's entrance window.

Target photons strike the photocathode, liberating single photoelectrons which pass into the microchannel plate (MCP). There they are multiplied to a pulse of ~4 x 105 electrons. The pulse is recorded by an anode array behind the photocathode and detected by the MAMA electronics which process it, rejecting false pulses and determining the origin of the photon event on the detector.

The FUV-MAMA has a field electrode (or repeller wire, as it is affectionately called) which is used to repel electrons emitted away from the microchannel plate back into the channels. This provides an increase in quantum efficiency of the detector at the price of a small increase in the detector PSF halo. The repeller wire is always on for FUV-MAMA observations.

Figure 7.9: Design of the FUV-MAMA

MAMA Spectral Response

The spectral responses of the unfiltered FUV- and NUV-MAMAs are illustrated in Figure 5.12. The peak photocathode response of the FUV-MAMA occurs at Lyman-. Its spectral response is defined by the cutoff of the MgF₂ window at 1150 Å at short wavelengths, and by the relatively steep decline of the CsI photocathode at long wavelengths. Out-of-band QE at longer wavelengths (>2000 Å) is <10-6 yielding excellent solar-blind performance. The NUV-MAMA spectral response has a relatively flat maximum (~10%) which encompasses 1800-2600 Å. The photocathode QE declines to ~4% at 3150 Å, while at longer wavelengths the out-of-band QE is ~10-4. (See also Unfiltered (Clear) MAMA Imaging-25MAMA.)

MAMA Sensitivity

Monitoring of the MAMA sensitivity through October 2000 shows mode-dependent trends with time. Tests of selected low- and medium-resolution modes show a range of decrease in average sensitivity between about 1 to 2% per year. A more complete description of the change in sensitivity over time can be found in STIS ISR 2000-03.

Figure 7.11 and Figure 7.12 show the change in relative sensitivity of the G140L and G230L settings, respectively, versus time, together with a linear fit to each set of points. The value for the slope, i.e., the percentage change in sensitivity per year, and the 1 uncertainty are shown at the bottom of each plot. The 1 rms (in %) of the data about the fit is indicated by the 1 value for each.

Figure 7.10: Design of the NUV-MAMA

Figure 7.11: Sensitivity Decrease measured with the G140L Grating

Figure 7.12: Sensitivity Decrease measured with the G230L Grating

Optical Performance

Both MAMAs exhibit low-level extended wings in their detector point-spread functions (PSFs), with the NUV-MAMA PSF being considerably worse. Sample MAMA detector PSFs are shown in Figure 7.13. For those wishing to model their effect on absorption- or emission-line equivalent-width measurements or coronographic observations, the LSFs and detector PSFs are maintained on the STScI STIS World Wide Web site at:

http://www.stsci.edu/cgi-bin/stis?cat=calibration&subcat=refdata 

The repeller wire is normally on for FUV-MAMA observations, but an improvement to the FUV-MAMA PSF (at the expense of somewhat reduced sensitivity) can be made by disabling the high voltage to the wire. This procedure is only recommended for observations that use the E140H, and perhaps also the E140M, gratings when used with the 0.1X0.03 aperture (sometimes called the ``Jenkins slit'') for observations shortward of 1400 Å. In pre-launch testing, resolutions as high as R ~ 220,000 (i.e. two high-res pixels) were obtained in observations of a mono-isotopic emission line lamp, and R ~ 200,000 has been achieved on-orbit (Jenkins 2000, BAAS 32, 731). Figure 7.14 shows the effect of disabling the repeller voltage for the case of an observation of a linelamp with the E140H cenwave 1234 setting. Note that the main difference is not the FWHM of the central core, but a decrease in the intensity of the line wings.

Only a small number of proposals per cycle (of the order of one to two) requesting the repeller off mode will be accepted. Note that repeller off observations will require special treatment, so a scientific case will need to be made for why these observations are necessary. In addition, there are some disadvantages to the use of this mode. See the information provided at http://www.stsci.edu/cgi-bin/stis?stisid=561 for more details.

Note that, due to the large PSF of HST in imaging mode (currently 3.5 low-res pixels), there is no advantage in performing FUV-MAMA imaging observations with the repeller wire voltage turned off.

Figure 7.13: MAMA Detector PSFs

Figure 7.14: Average Profile of Calibration Lamp Line at 1234 Å with the Repeller Wire On and Off