As in previous cycles, the Cycle 10 calibration program is aimed at maintaining the calibration of WFPC2 via the internal and external monitoring programs as well as performing several new tests. The standard suite of calibrations will be continued, including those used to monitor the health of the instrument as well as the programs to collect data for calibration reference files. In addition, several new proposals will be implemented: a measurement of the effect of CTE on astrometry, a characterization of the PSF wings, a calibration check of the clocks ON mode, and a test of the methane quad filter throughput. The total spacecraft time required for the Cycle 10 plan is 61 externals orbits and 2294 occultation periods. This estimate does not include any calibrations associated with Servicing Mission (SM3b), which occurred in March 2002.
We also note that two "calibration outsourcing" programs are underway to improve the UV flatfields and test for a position-independent component of CTE. See Future Calibrations, Calibration by Observers, and Calibration Outsourcing for details.
Cen (same positions as Cycle 9 proposal 8813) is observed with large shifts (35'') in F555W only, every ~six months. This will allow tracking of the shifts in the relative positions of the chips or changes in the astrometric solution at the sub-pixel level. Kelsall spot images will be taken in conjunction with each execution.
Cen (NGC 5139) to continue tracking changes in the CTE (charge transfer efficiency) losses in WFPC2. A continuation of proposals in earlier cycles (7629, 8447, and 8821), the principal observations will be at gain 7, in F814W and F555W, taken with and without a variety of preflash (background) levels (20 to 1000 e-). The same pointing is used at WF2 and WF4; along with the relative orientation of the chips, this results in stars at the bottom of one chip falling near the top of the other chip.
Cen, and a field of faint galaxies (from extended target CTE proposal 8456). Both fields in both targets will be chosen to have a bright star surrounded by fainter objects. While most of the test is performed on the PC, the WFC CCDs will also be important, as they can provide a sanity check on the motions made with the FGSs. The motions on the WFC CCDs will be a smaller number of pixels, and hence less subject to CTE variations. (Though the larger WFC pixels will make astrometry more difficult). Hence some care should be taken to have stars available on the WFC CCDs, though PC1 is the detector of primary interest.
|
Space Telescope Science Institute http://www.stsci.edu Voice: (410) 338-1082 help@stsci.edu |